Opening
and closing this menu:
Ctrl
+
M
Go to main menu
Go to footer
Go to sitemap
Check order status
0800 066 3422
0800 066 3422
Today:
7:00 - 19:00
Click if you
live in Ireland
Tyres
Car tyres
Off-Road tyres
Cargo tyres
Motorcycle tyres
By season
Summer tyres
Winter tyres
All-season tyres
Popular brands
Bridgestone Tyres
Pirelli Tyres
Imperial Tyres
All manufacturers
Tyre ranking
Tyres by vehicle details
Wheels
Alloy wheels
Steel wheels
Fit the tyre to the rim
Basket
Contrast
Oponeo
Tests and reviews
Tyre opinions Pirelli CINTURATO P7
Pirelli CINTURATO P7 - User reviews
20
21
22
Sort:
Date added ascending
Date added descending
Comfort increasingly
Comfort decreasingly
Cost increasingly
Cost decreasingly
Rating ascending
Rating in descending order
Road rising
Road declining
Terrain increasingly
Off-road in descending order
ave
4.1
I did about 8 thousand miles on these tyres (the car is a BMW 3 Series, Run Flat tyres). Due to the fact that I chose Run Flats, the tyres are intentionally harder and louder than the "standard" version, but still quiet enough so the noise does not bother anyone. A very big advantage is theie low abrasion. After these 8 thousand miles there's no sign of tread wear (and I also had a bit of fun on these tyres). Correct behaviour on wet, but you have to be careful with the rear wheel drive and ESP switched off. Very good grip when starting on wet and dry, it's hard to get the wheels spinning for too long. Overall, Pirelli P7 Cinturatos are tyres I can definitely recommend.
Additional information
Distance made:
10000 - 15000 miles
Place of use:
usually outside the city
Driving style:
fast and dynamic
Vehicle:
-
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4
The grip on wet surface
4
Driving comfort
Noise level
5
Bump absorption
3
Other
Tyre appearance
3
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
5
Feathering, durability
5
dry
4.0
By purchasing this tire whose quality is nested in the premium class expecting luxury by large L. Maybe I'm not disappointed, but probably surprised because I was expecting a bit better presentation. On a dry road it performs superbly well-kept asphalt and not too much noise in wet conditions one can not complain too much, even when driving through a puddle at high speed sticks to the track. Tires are fairly quiet. However, I was surprised that I could not drive completely across the wet grass on a slight hill. Although moderately operated on gas I slipped as to the former bald. In addition, after the first season of use on one of the tires on the side of the balloon appeared, and tread also has significantly erasure. So I do not think it was worth it to overpay because it is a premium tire with a little different from the tires middle-class or even budget class.
Additional information
Distance made:
2000 - 5000 miles
Place of use:
usually in the city
Driving style:
moderate
Vehicle:
no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
5
The grip on wet surface
3
Driving comfort
Noise level
5
Bump absorption
5
Other
Tyre appearance
4
Frequent failures
Yes
Economy
Economy
3
Feathering, durability
2
JT
4.0
My only slight criticism would be it's slightly noisy on motorway. Other than that brilliant tyre highly reccommeund
Additional information
Distance made:
10000 - 15000 miles
Place of use:
usually outside the city
Driving style:
moderate
Vehicle:
BMW 5 Series Sedan F10 520d EfficientDynamics Edition (135kW)
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
5
The grip on wet surface
4
Driving comfort
Noise level
3
Bump absorption
4
Other
Tyre appearance
3
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
3
Feathering, durability
4
Cezary Cezary
3.9
for the price tire ideal only apparent drawback is the noise
Translation
Additional information
Distance made:
2000 - 5000 miles
Place of use:
usually in the city
Driving style:
moderate
Vehicle:
Audi A4 Sedan B8 2.0 TDI (88kW)
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4
The grip on wet surface
4
Driving comfort
Noise level
3
Bump absorption
4
Other
Tyre appearance
4
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
3
Feathering, durability
3
MG
3.9
I do not know where the opinions about the durability of this tyre come from - at my place, after 30 thousand km, the tyres of 245/45/17 size on the rear axle are no longer there - reached to the indicators. I do not drive like a madman, rather moderately, the fact that the car is heavy + rear-wheel drive, but to wear them so much? The front will easily last another 2 seasons - 3-4 mm to the indicators. Apart from that, a tyre like any other.
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000 miles
Place of use:
usually outside the city
Driving style:
moderate
Vehicle:
Mercedes Klasa E Sedan W212 200 CGI (135kW)
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4
The grip on wet surface
4
Driving comfort
Noise level
4
Bump absorption
3
Other
Tyre appearance
3
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
3
Feathering, durability
2
sylvester
3.8
Previously I had Kleber Dynaxer HP3s and they seemed poor to me but after changing to Pirelli P7 Cinturatos I changed my mind. Pirellis are hard and very often twisted, it seemed to me that Klebers are loud but Pirellis are comparable. I put the tyres on the car and at 70 MPH the car began to fall into vibrations - sorry but I changed to them from old winter Barums, and there wass nothing like that there, and this is a premium class new tyre - and it's poor to me.
Additional information
Distance made:
2000 - 5000 miles
Place of use:
usually outside the city
Driving style:
moderate
Vehicle:
VW Golf V 2.0 TDI
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
5
The grip on wet surface
4
Driving comfort
Noise level
4
Bump absorption
3
Other
Tyre appearance
3
Frequent failures
Yes
Economy
Economy
3
Feathering, durability
3
Mark
3.8
Previously I used Continentals and I think that Pirelli P7 Cinturatos are worse. I have a feeling they are harder and have greater rolling resistance. Probably Continentals did better.
Additional information
Distance made:
below 2000 miles
Place of use:
in terrain + in the city
Driving style:
moderate
Vehicle:
Volvo S40 II 2.0 D
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4
The grip on wet surface
4
Driving comfort
Noise level
4
Bump absorption
4
Other
Tyre appearance
3
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
3
Feathering, durability
3
John Black
3.8
Additional information
Distance made:
below 2000 miles
Place of use:
in terrain + in the city
Driving style:
moderate
Vehicle:
Volvo S40 II 2.0 D
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4
The grip on wet surface
4
Driving comfort
Noise level
4
Bump absorption
4
Other
Tyre appearance
3
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
3
Feathering, durability
3
krush
3.7
Overall, I am satisfied with purchased tyres. no matter if the surface was wet or dry, they behaved superbly. Their drawback is relatively short life span. I did about 35 000 miles since purchasing (maybe a bit more). Today (5th November) I changed my tyres to winter ones and my mechanics claimed that P7 Cinturatos are no use anymore. One axle had the tread at tread wear index level, the other two were slightly over the marker.
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000 miles
Place of use:
usually outside the city
Driving style:
moderate
Vehicle:
Volvo V50 Estate
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
Yes
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
4
The grip on wet surface
4
Driving comfort
Noise level
3
Bump absorption
4
Other
Tyre appearance
4
Frequent failures
No
Economy
Economy
3
Feathering, durability
3
Czeloo
3.6
Overall the tyre is not bad but not suitable for certain cars. Strengths: - relatively low rolling resistance - very good dry grip and good control in case of loss of grip - Good steering precision - decent longevity - good control in case of loss of grip in the wet - fairly easy balancing and no "run-out" of the tyre - decent resistance to aquaplaning - The biggest advantage of the tyres is the control of the car after losing grip in dry and wet (additionally it is easy to sense when a skid occurs) AND the grip on dry pavement. Drawbacks: - quite significant noise from the start - they make a distinct noise and this is due to the high hardness of the tread - the biggest disadvantage is that the tyre increases the car floating on ruts, also tested on a BMW E92. Compared to other tyres, the car simply starts pulling hard to the right and left on ruts. - Wet grip, first season ok, next season worse, always has a TC reaction when starting in the wet. - Unevenness damping is ok, but noticeably worse than on the softer Goodyears. - Due to the shape of the tread, the tyres increase the resistance to steering when manoeuvring and parking.
Additional information
Distance made:
more than 15000 miles
Place of use:
usually in the city
Driving style:
moderate
Vehicle:
Opel Astra Hatchback H 1.8 (5/110)
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:
No
Detailed rating of tyres
Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface
5
The grip on wet surface
3
Driving comfort
Noise level
3
Bump absorption
3
Other
Tyre appearance
4
Frequent failures
-
Economy
Economy
4
Feathering, durability
3
20
21
22
Total rating of the tyre
4.3
Comfort
4.1
Road
4.4
Off-Road
-
Cost
4.1
Buy