Nokian Tyres ZG2 - User reviews

Sort:
Mark
4.2
Great tyres, the car goes very quietly and comfortably. If someone is looking for tyres for really dynamic driving, it's a perfect choice. I must admit that Nokian did a good job.

Additional information

Distance made:5000 - 10000 miles
Place of use:usually in the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:-
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:Yes

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface4
The grip on wet surface4
Driving comfort
Noise level4
Bump absorption4
Other
Tyre appearance4
Frequent failuresNo
Economy
Economy4
Feathering, durability4
george86
4.1
I bought them recently, compared to the Michelins fitted to my A6 when I bought it, Nokians are very quiet and comfortable. Holes in the surface are almost inaudible, which is better than my previous tyres, as they fell down the bump hard and the noise was larger. I recommend them for 100%

Additional information

Distance made:2000 - 5000 miles
Place of use:usually outside the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:-
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:Yes

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface4
The grip on wet surface4
Driving comfort
Noise level5
Bump absorption4
Other
Tyre appearance3
Frequent failuresNo
Economy
Economy4
Feathering, durability4
Marco
4.0
I recommend. I bought Nokians with DOT 0412. They have polished grooves, very good finishing, there are no production residues.

Additional information

Distance made:2000 - 5000 miles
Place of use:usually outside the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:-
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:Yes

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface4
The grip on wet surface4
Driving comfort
Noise level4
Bump absorption4
Other
Tyre appearance4
Frequent failuresNo
Economy
Economy4
Feathering, durability4
Peter
4.0
I got them with my wheels in size 215/45/17 91 Y XL. As for the driveability and behavious, the car does well on both dry and wet pavement, quick starting, hard braking gets a 5. The only drawback of these tyres is as one of the users wrote: "The one thing that put me off them and make me certainly not want to buy more of them is that thy have cracked in many places and they look like they're 10 years old." My tyres are from 2008, and a year ago (after three seasons) the edges of the tyres looked horrible, like that rubber was cracked and stored incorrectly. Now one got damaged, and the time has come to buy something else :)

Additional information

Distance made:more than 15000 miles
Place of use:usually outside the city
Driving style:calm
Vehicle:-
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface4
The grip on wet surface4
Driving comfort
Noise level4
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance5
Frequent failuresYes
Economy
Economy4
Feathering, durability4
Ozzy
4.0
The tyre has sensational traction. It handles nicely, and driving comfort is much higher due to good handling. Definitely worth buying.

Additional information

Distance made:5000 - 10000 miles
Place of use:usually in the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:-
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:Yes

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface4
The grip on wet surface4
Driving comfort
Noise level3
Bump absorption4
Other
Tyre appearance4
Frequent failuresNo
Economy
Economy4
Feathering, durability3
Greg
3.8
This is my third Nokia, and the first in Russia, and for this reason last. After driving 45000 km tire wear index 2 (!). Very good grip in the wet. So what. Corrosion on external rubber pads in the spring after the change of trouble with balancing - it turns out that 2 of the 4 tires grew ovate ("beating" vertical 1 cm), which is czteronapędowym car trouble. Nokia Russia HAVE Tourneo technology. I do not recommend.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:more than 15000 miles
Place of use:usually in the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:Subaru Legacy Kombi IV
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface4
The grip on wet surface4
Driving comfort
Noise level4
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance-
Frequent failuresYes
Economy
Economy2
Feathering, durability1
Maciej S
3.8
After three seasons, I'm disappointed. The longer I drive the louder. 205/55/16 ZR.Kiepsko adhesion looks at faster turning maneuvers.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:10000 - 15000 miles
Place of use:in terrain + in the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:VW Passat Sedan B6 2.0 TDI
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface4
The grip on wet surface4
Driving comfort
Noise level2
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance3
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy4
Feathering, durability4
Ralph
3.6
A good choice if you want tyres the highest durability. It's hard to find a more durable product. The tire is actually "unwearable".

Additional information

Distance made:more than 15000 miles
Place of use:in terrain + in the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:-
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:Yes

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface3
The grip on wet surface4
Driving comfort
Noise level3
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance4
Frequent failuresNo
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability3
suchy
3.4
Tires difficult to balance, in spite of optimization of the tire to the rim, at higher speeds beaten terribly. After 25,000 thousand quiet ride so you can still see the front 5mm 8mm, riding on dry very well, braking on wet barely average. Due to the beating of the tires do not recommend, I will Nokia clears big bow

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:more than 15000 miles
Place of use:usually in the city
Driving style:calm
Vehicle:no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface4
The grip on wet surface2
Driving comfort
Noise level4
Bump absorption5
Other
Tyre appearance5
Frequent failuresNo
Economy
Economy4
Feathering, durability5
Matt
3.2
I sought for appropriate tyres for a long time. I considered buying Dunlop Sportmaxx RTs, Vredestein Ultrac Centos, and Nokian ZG2s. I read the reviews, analyzed the tests in automotive press and chose Nokian ZG2s. Nokian had sensational resulats in all tests, and that persuaded me to purchase them but after driving a few hundred miles I can say that it was a mistake! The tyre is hard, not very comfortable and the car "bounces" on bumps. As for performance on wet, I can't comment because I haven't driven in these conditions on these tyres yet. The desing also isn't perfect, and polished grooves are just a marketing trick. If I was to buy new tyres again, the choice would be Dunlop Sportmaxx.This tyre is relatively soft and thanks to that absobrs bumps well.

Additional information

Distance made:below 2000 miles
Place of use:usually in the city
Driving style:calm
Vehicle:-
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:Yes

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface3
The grip on wet surface3
Driving comfort
Noise level3
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance3
Frequent failuresNo
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability3
Total rating of the tyre
4.3
4.3
4.4
-
4.2
Buy