Zeetex HP102 - User reviews

Sort:
hans kloss
1.1
Where did they come from positive entries for this thing (because the tire's hard to call it)? I think I write them only representatives of Zeetex, because HP102 no way to recommend even to the trailer to the tractor. I do not know, how can you sell something like that. I bought these tires with the car, if wyząbkowanie can still somehow explain it other disadvantages of this junk anymore. Keeping with a width of 245 it was a nightmare. Tires were literally like a ball and chain - heavy and clumsy. Pulling the steering wheel on virtually every rut, lining the right and left when passing by every bump, beating braking discs of bent as if - I did not know what happened with the car at all happens. I was convinced that the size 245/45/18 (though pre-authorized) is inadequate for this car. I was about to go on the rim 17 '', but I decided to take a chance and bought an attempt Michelin. After changing the car just started normally (or even great) ride comfortably absorb, no longer fall into every hole and follow each groove asphalt. In addition, there was no need oblepić half rim weights, as in the case Zeetexów HP102 and the wet fear not go. I was driving on the highway Zeetexach in the rain, in spite of the tread approx. 5 mm could not exceed 100 km / h, the tires were floating. Now I know that the cause of all the trouble with running tires were just Zeetex HP102. I would not recommend this to anyone, at this price a hundred times better to buy a used tire reputable manufacturer.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:2000 - 5000 miles
Place of use:usually in the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:Renault Espace Van
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface1
The grip on wet surface1
Driving comfort
Noise level1
Bump absorption1
Other
Tyre appearance1
Frequent failuresNo
Economy
Economy2
Feathering, durability2
AG
1.0
In the wet I felt like ice. The worst tire I've had so far. Although I have 2.0-liter engine in the wet even at 3 gear for acceleration of the tire buksowały and turn on the ESP. And in the end after about 10000km invaded the curb and the tire burst from the inside. Vulcanizer said that is not suitable for repair.

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:10000 - 15000 miles
Place of use:usually in the city
Driving style:calm
Vehicle:no data was found.
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface1
The grip on wet surface1
Driving comfort
Noise level1
Bump absorption1
Other
Tyre appearance1
Frequent failuresYes
Economy
Economy1
Feathering, durability1
Edi
1.0
Tires not worth anything after 3 thousand km, there was nothing tread company said the complaint did not consider that I had too little air in the tires and thus after those 3000 km were consumed

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:2000 - 5000 miles
Place of use:all terrain and outside the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:Opel Vectra Sedan B 2.0 16V (5/110)
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface1
The grip on wet surface1
Driving comfort
Noise level1
Bump absorption1
Other
Tyre appearance1
Frequent failuresYes
Economy
Economy1
Feathering, durability1
paweł
1.0
tires are not suitable for driving, exceeding 120km / godz.są such vibrations, it's hard to keep the wheel

Translation

Additional information

Distance made:below 2000 miles
Place of use:usually outside the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:Peugeot 508 SW I 2.0 HDi FAP 160 (120kW)
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface1
The grip on wet surface1
Driving comfort
Noise level1
Bump absorption1
Other
Tyre appearance1
Frequent failuresYes
Economy
Economy1
Feathering, durability1
Total rating of the tyre
3.8
3.8
3.8
-
3.9
Buy