Bridgestone Blizzak LM30 - User reviews

Sort:
Peter
3.2

Translation

Welcome. I purchased a set of tyres Bridgestone LM30 out of necessity, because they practically only been available for my tyre size (this was the time when the first snow fell and missed tyres in storage). I will be brief, in the snow and slush total failure and misunderstanding. What about the fact that it can and does well in wet conditions and on a dry road, as it is a winter tyre and should be good to "work" in the snow, and this probably expect from the people looking for winter tyres. I travel quite a lot of snow on the roads outside the city, and often in the mountains, and this tyre simply can not cope or in deeper snow, or slush. A friend in the same car as me (Fiat Grande Punto) has Uniroyal and exercise a lot better than the Bridgestone (I suggest reading reviews that are positive for the Randy), and the cost is much cheaper. Previously rode in Debice Frigo Directional Fait Seicento and also exercised a lot better than Bridgestone. I'm a driving instructor and I wanted to buy a good and safe winter tyres, and here, and I feel disappointed that kicked your money away. In summary: I would NOT recommend people jeżdżącym in harsh winter conditions (in may be ok, but outside the city and in the mountains themselves simply can not handle, though, and the municipal parking lots with plenty of residual snow or slush it is not fun).

Additional information

Distance made:below 2000 miles
Place of use:usually outside the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:No data
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:Yes

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface3
The grip on wet surface3
The grip on snow and slush1
Driving comfort
Noise level3
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance3
Frequent failuresNo
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability3
PIK
3.2

Translation

I have used various winter tyres of different companies, these are the worst on what came to my ride. In my opinion, this tyre should not be called a winter tyre, because similar results can ride in the winter to summer tyres. The only positives are the high driving comfort, driving on dry pavement, and with the exception of starting driving on wet roads. But what is most important or performance on snow and slush is a drama. The complete lack of grip when moving off, cornering behavior difficult to predict, even when not braking in high speed = slip and continuous dancing in the street when turning. I do not recommend this because the premium tyre is just the price.

Additional information

Distance made:below 2000 miles
Place of use:usually outside the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:No data
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:Yes

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface4
The grip on wet surface4
The grip on snow and slush2
Driving comfort
Noise level3
Bump absorption5
Other
Tyre appearance4
Frequent failuresNo
Economy
Economy4
Feathering, durability4
AKacek
2.8

Translation

Tyre average, on both dry and wet road is fine, the snow too, but clearly weaker, particularly for braking. The disadvantages are high rolling resistance (difference 0.5 liters per 100 km between Michelin Energy Saver on the Fiat GP), very loud and very fast clash. Previous Fulda tyres, however, were better.

Additional information

Distance made:10000 - 15000 miles
Place of use:usually outside the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:No data
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface4
The grip on wet surface3
The grip on snow and slush3
Driving comfort
Noise level2
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance4
Frequent failuresNo
Economy
Economy2
Feathering, durability2
Stanislaw
2.7

Translation

Peugeot 406 station wagon, previously ridden for many years to GoodYear UG (6.7), unfortunately, the previous winter on one tyre (UG7) bulge reappeared after 2 seasons (apparently GoodYear moved production to China), 2 pcs UG7 have listed for persuasion service at Bridgestone LM30, gave them to the front drive axle - after tens of km winter I returned to serisu and asked to postpone satrych UG7 the front drive axle, because the new LM 30 was hardly behaved like "lyse" total defeat by me, can not understand from where so many positive LM30 reviews for winter - definitely not recommend. Bridgestonach summer workout - and are OK - winter unfortunately.

Additional information

Distance made:2000 - 5000 miles
Place of use:usually in the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:No data
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface3
The grip on wet surface2
The grip on snow and slush2
Driving comfort
Noise level3
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance4
Frequent failuresNo
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability3
Swiergus72
2.6

Translation

tyres are great in performance. Uses them in a variety of means in each area. Overall, not bad, but the noise level is not acceptable, even at the speed of transport but it is bearable but after exceeding 80km / h terrible buzzing and humming and have only driven about 7000tys/km. certainly do not have a pile of tyres match. We strongly advise against!!

Additional information

Distance made:5000 - 10000 miles
Place of use:in terrain + in the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:No data
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface3
The grip on wet surface3
The grip on snow and slush3
Driving comfort
Noise level1
Bump absorption2
Other
Tyre appearance3
Frequent failuresNo
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability3
Marek
2.2

Translation

So far I've used micheln alpine and poorly made that changed the manufacturer, are weak not worth the money.

Additional information

Distance made:5000 - 10000 miles
Place of use:in terrain + in the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:No data
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface3
The grip on wet surface2
The grip on snow and slush1
Driving comfort
Noise level3
Bump absorption3
Other
Tyre appearance3
Frequent failuresNo
Economy
Economy3
Feathering, durability3
Koko
1.6

Translation

I bought a car with a set of winter wheels. After installing these wheels with tires Bridgestone noise in the car was unbearable, loud tires, I would not recommend them to anyone, the year of manufacture of tires in 2012, after two seasons are to be discarded, even though the tread is ok, then founded the Firestone Winterhawk 3 and is in the car normally, tires do not recommend it.

Additional information

Distance made:more than 15000 miles
Place of use:all terrain and outside the city
Driving style:fast and dynamic
Vehicle:No data
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface2
The grip on wet surface2
The grip on snow and slush2
Driving comfort
Noise level1
Bump absorption1
Other
Tyre appearance-
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy2
Feathering, durability2
Przemosbb
1.5

Translation

Hello, unfortunately I ride on the LM 30 second season - Leaseplan says it has only about .... I agree with the other reviews that slush, snow, fear to go, in general you can not maintain the trajectory of driving. Riding Volvo V 50 on grazing only because somehow I move. When uphill in the snow tragedy. they belong to. In doing an average of 50 thousand km so I have some idea, previously ridden on Goodyerach, Continentalach, and BF Goodrichach. Compared to the LM 30 to be great. I advise against buying the more that the cost of these tires do not nakeżą, in addition, they are loud.

Additional information

Distance made:more than 15000 miles
Place of use:in terrain + in the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:No data
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface3
The grip on wet surface3
The grip on snow and slush1
Driving comfort
Noise level1
Bump absorption2
Other
Tyre appearance2
Frequent failuresNo
Economy
Economy1
Feathering, durability1
Szymon
1.4

Translation

I did not have worse tires. I bought the car in the fall and was already on these tires and I thought of the great and the spring will be here lipa. Literally 1-2cm of snow and end up with safe driving at speeds above 50km / h, you can not normally go. Even frost on the tarmac for this tire is a mega problem. Fortunately, the winter this year because there was almost no longer had to buy other tires. So I leave them for the summer but unfortunately even without frost does not stick to the road after a rain behave a little better as the snow.

Additional information

Distance made:5000 - 10000 miles
Place of use:usually outside the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:No data
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:No

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface2
The grip on wet surface1
The grip on snow and slush1
Driving comfort
Noise level2
Bump absorption2
Other
Tyre appearance2
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy2
Feathering, durability2
emil
1.4

Translation

Di mature are not mekern ech kllase and disem award kan

Additional information

Distance made:more than 15000 miles
Place of use:usually outside the city
Driving style:moderate
Vehicle:No data
Will you recommend these tyres to other users?:Yes

Detailed rating of tyres

Driving qualities
The grip on dry surface2
The grip on wet surface2
The grip on snow and slush1
Driving comfort
Noise level2
Bump absorption1
Other
Tyre appearance1
Frequent failures-
Economy
Economy1
Feathering, durability1
Total rating of the tyre
4.0
3.9
4.0
-
3.8